• Sony Spider-Man Universe

    From Mike Dippel@954:895/1 to All on Wednesday, December 11, 2024 14:45:52
    The Sony Spider-Man Universe was doomed from the start, and there are
    only
    two ways to save it without Tom Holland's popular webslinger

    Date:
    Wed, 11 Dec 2024 15:16:28 +0000

    Description:
    As Kraven the Hunter reportedly brings down the curtain on the SSU, I won't
    be shedding a single tear over the failed Marvel spin-off franchise.

    FULL STORY
    ===============================================
    =======================

    Another year, another cinematic universe's death. Just 12 months after
    Aquaman and the Lost Kingdom put the final nail in the coffin of the DC Extended Universe ( DCEU ), Kraven the Hunter , one of 2024's final new
    movies , is set to do the same to the Sony Spider-Man Universe (SSU).

    Indeed, a new report from The Wrap , with input from Sony Pictures
    insiders,
    all but confirms the SSU, which was previously and confusingly called the Sony Pictures Universal of Marvel Characters (SPUMC), is being axed less
    than
    a decade after it began.

    Frankly, nobody should be surprised by this development. Sony might have lucked out with the release of Venom , the 2018 Tom Hardy-starring Spidey spin-off that, despite middling reviews from critics, stunned industry
    experts with its $856 million box office haul. Even back then, though, it was clear that the SSU was never going to be able sustain that success because
    of
    the humungous elephant or should that be spider? in the room. 2018's
    Venom
    movie ensured the SSU got off to a hot start, but it couldn't sustain is
    early success (Image credit: Sony Pictures)

    Yep, the absolutely bizarre decision not to include a single live-action version of Spider-Man Tobey Maguire, Andrew Garfield, or current
    incumbent
    Tom Holland in any of the SSU's six movies was a huge mistake. You can't attempt to replicate the success and popularity of the Marvel Cinematic Universe ( MCU ) by building a franchise without the one individual capable
    of holding it all together. Warner Bros. wouldn't create a Batman cinematic universe that the Dark Knight never appears in, is only referenced once or twice per movie, and where projects are based around his iconic rogues
    gallery whose origin stories have to undergo significant changes to work around the Caped Crusader's absence. It would be an impossible task, and
    one
    I and many other Batman fans would struggle to comprehend.

    So, why did Sony pursue a Spider-Man-less cinematic franchise? The short answer is it wanted a slice of the superhero genre juggernaut pie. The company's multimedia division saw the kind of money that the MCU and, at
    the
    time, the DCEU was raking in, and thought it could create a similarly money-spinning franchise. Unfortunately for Sony, Venom proved to be an outlier. Sure, it made tons of money, but the diminishing returns of its sequels and other SSU films Kraven is projected to make a paltry $13
    million
    to $15 million (per Variety ) at the US box office prove that audiences have grown tired of not only a franchise lacking its primary superhero, but also one whose genre identity was as clear as mud.

    The much longer answer lies in Sony's decision to agree to an Avengers -
    style
    team-up with Marvel Studios and allow Spider-Man to finally swing into the MCU. Following his debut as the iconic webslinger in 2016's Captain America: Civil War , Holland's Peter Parker/Spider-Man has become one of the MCU's crown jewels. Just look at the $4 billion-plus global takings that Holland's three standalone MCU movies have jointly accumulated and you'll realize
    how
    popular Holland's take on the legendary superhero is.

    Okay, 2021's Spider-Man: No Way Home was aided by a huge helping of
    nostalgia, but it's still a film led by an actor who's become a bona fide A-lister over the past eight years. Some of Holland's non-Marvel projects, such as Apple TV Plus ' Cherry and The Crowded Room , and Sony's film adaptation of Naughty Dog's videogame series Uncharted , weren't popular
    with
    critics. Audiences, though, were immediately drawn to them because of Holland's involvement, so his star power can't be overlooked. Spider-Man:
    No
    Way Home saw three generations of webslingers appear on the big screen
    for
    the first time (Image credit: Sony Pictures/Marvel Studios)

    The SSU's biggest problem, then, existed long before it started. Sony
    couldn't make its own cinematic franchise with Holland's Spider-Man because
    he exists in another one, aka the MCU.

    Sure, the ongoing Marvel Multiverse Saga is breaking down the barriers
    between cinematic universes based around Marvel Comics' ever-expanding
    roster
    of heroes and villains. That, though, hasn't helped Sony's cause because, well, the SSU began before the Multiverse Saga did. Besides the odd
    reference
    in Venom: Let There Be Carnage and Morbius , Sony hasn't made a
    concerted
    effort to aid any crossover event by refusing to acknowledge the existence of Holland's Spider-Man, either.

    Sony can claim Spider-Man wouldn't exist in the MCU without its partnership with Marvel and that, because it retains the rights to the webhead, his
    legion of associated characters, and movie distribution rights, it still
    holds the cards from a negotiating perspective. But, let's be honest: people watch Spider-Man movies because a) he's one of the most popular
    superheroes
    of all-time and b) he's currently part of the biggest shared cinematic universe to ever exist. Sorry, Sony, but neither of those have got anything
    to do with you. Sony has enjoyed more success with its animated Spider-
    Verse
    movies than its live-action, villain-starring spin-offs (Image credit: Sony Pictures)

    So, what's the solution? Just as Spider-Man: No Way Home , aka one of the
    best Marvel movies and best superhero movies , initiated a hard reset for its eponymous hero in the MCU, the SSU requires a reboot not dissimilar from it
    or James Gunn's reborn DC Cinematic Universe ( DCU ).

    For me, there are two ways Sony can go about resuscitating its cinematic franchise. The first and most simple option is to just keep making Spider-
    Man
    projects that aren't tethered to any of their counterparts. Right now, there are three such productions in active development: number one, Spider-Man
    4 ,
    i.e. the wallcrawler's next MCU adventure that'll be part of the Marvel Phase 6 line-up. Number two, the Nic Cage-starring Spider-Man Noir TV show
    that'll
    be released on Prime Video . And, number three, Spider-Man: Beyond the Spider-Verse , the third and final Spider-Verse flick that'll wrap up Miles Morales and Spider-Gwen's story in the multi-award-winning animated film series. Maintain that separation, continually remind audiences that they're not connected in any way, and people will check them out. The SSU is going
    on
    an indefinite hiatus, but Tom Holland's wallcrawler won't be taking time away from the MCU (Image credit: Sony Pictures/Marvel Entertainment)

    The other, perhaps more complicated solution is to bring back one of
    Spidey's
    former live-action stars in Maguire or Garfield, or restart a live-action Spider-Man universe with someone like Miles Morales at its heart. Indeed, complexities could arise in trying to convince Maguire or Garfield to return for a multi-movie deal when the former largely keeps a low profile these
    days, while the latter is enjoying success with non-superhero projects.
    Where
    Miles is concerned, Sony would need to convince fans that this iteration
    isn't the same one who starred in the Spider-Verse films, too, which would lead to viewer confusion if it isn't explained effectively.

    Sony would need to ensure a related issue doesn't emerge if it brings
    Maguire
    or Garfield back. Audiences may wonder if future films starring one of them are continuations of their Spider-Man movie franchises. If Sony only
    performs
    a soft reboot of the SSU, it runs the risk of creating confusion if any of
    its previous SSU movies, such as Venom are deemed canon in any new-look franchise. The DCU has already puzzled some viewers with such a scenario Creature Commandos , the first DCU Chapter One project, including
    references
    to the DCEU's The Suicide Squad and Peacemaker .

    I love Spider-Man. He's my all-time favorite superhero and, while I'm delighted he's a part of the MCU, it's been incredibly frustrating to see his legacy damaged by Sony's hackneyed approach to his illustrious rogues gallery. If and it's a huge if Sony revives the SSU after a lengthy hiatus, I really do hope that it does justice to the infamous wallcrawler. After all, "with great power, comes great responsibility". You might also like Find out how to watch the Marvel movies in order Or learn more about watching the Spider-Man movies in order Alternatively, see if you agree with our best Spider-Man movies ranked piece



    ===============================================
    =======================
    Link to news story: https://www.techradar.com/streaming/entertainment/the-sony-spider-man-
    universe
    -was-doomed-from-the-start-and-there-are-only-two-ways-to-save-it-
    without-tom-
    hollands-popular-webslinger

    --- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v7.0
    * Origin: The Hobby Line! BBS - hobbylinebbs.com (954:895/1)